Anticipatory Guidance for Neonates to Adolescents Table

No plagiarism Please

Anticipatory Guidance for Neonates to Adolescents Table

Anticipatory guidance helps family, caregivers, and others know what to expect according to the child’s growth and development. The guidance is done through collaboration between the healthcare provider and the caregiver. It is sometimes thought of as a type of counseling. Nurse practitioners working in pediatric primary care need to be experts on anticipatory guidance. There are excellent resources available and these are being updated as technologies and environments change.

This Assignment will demonstrate your ability to describe age-specific anticipatory guidance for the child and the family. Additionally, you will then have a reference table for quick glance created by you for future encounters with pediatric individuals and their families.

This assignment has a template that you will use to fill in the relevant elements of the anticipatory guidance per age group. The columns provide guidance to the specific areas such as safety and immunizations. If there is an area that is not applicable, such as oral health in infancy-newborn group, then place N/A in the box.

The article illustrates exactly why we need to ensure ethics is a part of all research.

Sepsis trial.pdf

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/901489

HHS Will Review Watchdog Group’s Call to Halt ‘Risky’ Sepsis Trial – Medscape – Aug 31, 2018.

Please post your articles with critique in this thread as well. 

Questions:

1. Do benefits of this research outweigh the cost to participants- what is the overall risk/benefit ratio. 

2. Would participants be considered vulnerabl? Were they subject to any physical harm, discomfort or psychological distress due to this study. 

3. Did researchers make efforts to minimize harm, maximize good.

4. Was appropriate informed consent procedures used? Was there full disclosure, was participant voluntary? Does any report discuss steps that were taken to protect privacy confidentiality of study participants. 

5. Were participants deceived in any way. Were they coerced into participating in study?