Chamberlian University American Indian Removal Act of 1830 Case Discussion

Case Study

  • Due Jul 28 by 11:59pm
  • Points 150
  • Submitting a file upload

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 9, 10 (section 10.4), 11 (section 11.5), 13
  • Lesson
  • 1 primary source that corresponds with your selected topic (noted in the topic instructions)
  • Minimum of 2 scholarly sources (in addition to the textbook)

Optional Resources to Explore
Feel free to review the library guide for scholarly sources and videos at the following link:

Introduction
The purposes of each case study assignment include the following:

  • To hone your abilities to research using scholarly sources
  • To advance critical thinking and writing skills
  • To compile a response to the prompts provided
  • To explore a historical topic and make connections to change over time

Instructions
Pick one (1) of the following topics. Then, address the corresponding questions/prompts for your selected topic. Use at least one (1) documented example of the corresponding primary source in your writing.

Option 1: The American System, Transportation, and Communication
Read the following primary source:

Then, address the following:

  • Describe the idea of Henry Clay’s “American System.”
  • Based on Clay’s economic vision of America, analyze how the American System would build the American market and economy?
  • Analyze the role of mechanization and communication in the American System.

Option 2: The Indian Removal Act of 1830
Read the following primary source:

Then, address the following:

  • Evaluate the rationale that President Jackson used in the removal of the Native Americans from east of the Mississippi River. Did the removal have the intended impact?
  • Identify the responsibilities given to the President under the Indian Removal Act of 1830.
  • Compare Jackson’s actions toward Native Americans in the context of his First Inaugural Address with the path of events during the Trail of Tears.
  • Determine if the removal of the Native Americans from east of the Mississippi River violate the principles found in the Declaration of Independence?

Option 3: The Abolitionist Movement
Read the following primary source:

Then, address the following:

  • Assess if abolitionists were responsible reformers or irresponsible agitators?
  • Explain how abolitionists upheld the Declaration of Independence as the foundation of antislavery and abolitionist thought.
  • Assess the effect of the Gag Rule on the Abolitionist Movement.
  • Analyze how the women’s rights movement would gain momentum from the antislavery movement.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page
  • In-text citations that correspond with your end references

Grading
This activity will be graded based on W3 Case Study Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 1, 3, 5

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

References

Library of Congress. (n.d.-a). Declaration of sentiments of the American anti-slavery society. Adopted at the formation of said society, in Philadelphia, on the 4th day of December, 1833. New York. Published by the American anti-slavery society, 142 Nassau Street. William S. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbpe.11801100/?st=gal…

Library of Congress. (n.d.-b). Of debates in Congress (Clay’s debate of the American system in 1832). Retrieved from https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llrd&…

Our Documents. (n.d.). Transcript of President Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress ‘On Indian removal’ (1830). Retrieved from https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&d…

Rubric

W3 Case Study Grading Rubric – 150 pts

W3 Case Study Grading Rubric – 150 pts

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength

5.0 pts

Meets length requirement

0.0 pts

Does not meet length requirement

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

15.0 pts

Paper addresses all aspects of the assignment.

12.75 pts

Paper addresses most aspects of the assignment.

11.25 pts

Paper addresses some aspects of the assignment.

9.0 pts

Paper addresses few aspects of the assignment.

0.0 pts

No effort

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

30.0 pts

Throughout the whole work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective.

25.5 pts

Throughout most of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective.

22.5 pts

Throughout some of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective.

18.0 pts

Throughout little of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective.

0.0 pts

No effort

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport

30.0 pts

Throughout the whole work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support.

25.5 pts

Throughout most of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support.

22.5 pts

Throughout some of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support.

18.0 pts

Throughout little of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support.

0.0 pts

No effort

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting: Mechanics & Usage

20.0 pts

The writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that would detract from a clear reading of the paper.

17.0 pts

The writing contains a few errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, but the errors do not detract from a clear reading of the text.

15.0 pts

The writing contains some errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that need to be addressed for a clearer reading of the paper.

12.0 pts

The writing contains several errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that impede a clear reading of the paper.

0.0 pts

No effort

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity & Flow

20.0 pts

The writing contains strong word choice that clarifies ideas and masterful sentence variety aids with the flow of ideas.

17.0 pts

The writing contains varied word choice and sentence structures that clarify ideas and aid with the flow of ideas.

15.0 pts

The writing contains word choice and sentence structures that can be revised for better clarification of ideas and flow of ideas.

12.0 pts

The writing contains wording and sentence structures that are awkward and/or unclear, impeding the clarity and flow of ideas.

0.0 pts

No effort

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Integration

10.0 pts

Paper includes reference to a scholarly source within the case study and properly integrates the source.

7.5 pts

Paper includes reference to a scholarly source within the case study but does not properly integrate the source.

0.0 pts

Paper does not make reference to a scholarly source provided within the case study.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA: Citation and Reference Formatting

10.0 pts

All sources are properly cited in the text and references page demonstrating a mastery of resource and APA citation reference format.

8.5 pts

Most sources are cited in the text and references page. Some minor errors may exist in citation, but it does not interfere with understanding the source of the information.

7.5 pts

Most sources are integrated, structured, and cited in the text and references page. Some errors may exist in citation that need to be addressed to clarify the source of information.

6.0 pts

Sources are not properly cited in the text/references page. Formatting contains several errors that suggest a lack of understanding of APA format.

0.0 pts

Paper is formatted to include less than 4 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Paper Format

10.0 pts

Paper is formatted to include all 7 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.

8.5 pts

Paper is formatted to include 6 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.

7.5 pts

Paper is formatted to include 5 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.

6.0 pts

Paper is formatted to include 4 of the following: title page, references page, Times New Roman font, 12-point font, double spacing, running header, and page numbers.

0.0 pts

No effort

10.0 pts

Total Points: 150.0

Next

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now